• Insolvency Insider Australia
  • Posts
  • Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd (No 8): The sequestration order was set aside but the costs story did not end there

Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd (No 8): The sequestration order was set aside but the costs story did not end there

Harold Peng of Matthews Folbigg shares that although the Federal Court set aside a sequestration order on appeal, it nonetheless required the former bankrupt to pay 80% of the creditor’s first instance, leave, and interlocutory costs, underscoring that costs turn on how litigation was conducted and where expense was generated rather than simply who ultimately succeeds.